Livros
URI permanente desta comunidadehttps://repositorio.insper.edu.br/handle/11224/3230
Navegar
23 resultados
Resultados da Pesquisa
Capítulo de Livro A Democracia aceita os termos e condições? : eleições 2022 e a política com os algoritmos(2022) RODOLFO DA SILVA AVELINOCapítulo de Livro New Forms of Shared Governance and Local Action Plan in Socially Vulnerable Settlements(2022) Leite, Carlos; Alvim, Angélica Tanus Benatti; Schröder, Jörg; Marques, Andresa Ledo; Getlinger, DanielaTransition peripheries: The entry presents two innovative dimensions in socially vulnerable settlements upgrading programs: first, the shared governance process which is developed with a strong presence of organized civil society through the articulation of a nongovernmental organization (NGO) network and the local community; second, a local action plan – Neighborhood Plan – developed with the community. The entry presents the case study of Jardim Lapena, a socially vulnerable settlement in the periphery of the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil, in terms of advances, limitations, and lessons learned, as well as discussions for potential replicability in other cities in the Global South.Capítulo de Livro Sistema Contemporáneo de Justicia Juvenil en Brasil: entre la cultura menorista y la lógica punitivista(2022) MARIANA CHIES SANTIAGO SANTOS; Gisi, BrunaCapítulo de Livro O desenvolvimento dos padrões interamericanos sobre a proibição da escravidão e da servidão(2022) Pucheta, Mauro Leonardo; Kalil, Renan BernardiCapítulo de Livro Trabalho via plataformas digitais e crowdwork: conhecer para regular(2022) Kalil, Renan BernardiCapítulo de Livro O poder empregatício no capitalismo de plataforma(2022) Kalil, Renan BernardiCapítulo de Livro A força normativa da Convenção n. 190 e da Recomendação n. 206 da OIT(2022) Kalil, Renan BernardiCapítulo de Livro What Do We Mean by Precedent? Empirical Evidence of Ordinary Usage(2022) Andrade, Priscila C. de; GUILHERME DA FRANCA COUTO FERNANDES DE ALMEIDA; Hannikainen, Ivar R.; Struchiner, NoelLegal theorists disagree about the nature of precedent. In a purely descriptive sense, what does it mean to say that a particular case sets a precedent? Does it (a) establish a rule that is deductively applied to subsequent cases (the deductive view), or (b) trace a relevant dimension of factual resemblance between the source case and subsequent cases by analogy (the analogical view)? To answer these questions, we conducted a series of three studies on the matter. In Study 1, we documented people’s tendency to adopt the analogical interpretation over the deductive one. Theorists have also debated whether, normatively, judges ought to apply precedents deductively or analogically—with some arguing that the analogical view affords excessive discretionary power. Yet, the results of Studies 2 and 3 undermine this claim: While participants did indeed infer more specific rules than analogical features (Study 2), the generality of analogical interpretation was not driven by the opportunity to treat prior cases as precedents (Study 3). These findings suggest that the analogical view is prevalent among the folk, while undermining some of the normative arguments against it.Capítulo de Livro Monitoramento na Prática Brasileira(2022) CAIO FARAH RODRIGUEZ; Vojvodic, Adriana; Sussekind, EvandroCapítulo de Livro Direitos Individuais Homogêneos e Coletivos no Direito da Concorrência: Análise da Atividade do CADE(2022) Bastos, João Leonardo Müller; Renzetti, Bruno Polonio
- «
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- »