Co-Authorship Recognition Antecedents: the Brazilian research community case

dc.contributor.authorCHARLES KIRSCHBAUM
dc.contributor.authorMascarenhas, André
dc.contributor.authorZambaldi, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorStrehlau, Suzane
dc.coverage.cidadeSão Paulopt_BR
dc.coverage.paisBrasilpt_BR
dc.creatorMascarenhas, André
dc.creatorZambaldi, Felipe
dc.creatorStrehlau, Suzane
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-25T03:36:17Z
dc.date.available2023-07-25T03:36:17Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractThe present paper explores the antecedents of co-authorship recognition in the Brazilian community of business administration research. Confronted with schematic vignettes encompassing varying levels of ambiguous and power-asymmetric situations, respondents exposed their positioning vis-à-vis co-authorship. Respondents identified the Brazilian community as favoring extrinsic exchanges (i.e., recognition is granted independently from effort invested in the research itself) even at situations where there was neither ambiguity that low effort was invested by the benefitting parties, nor power-asymmetric relationships. In contrast, individuals’ beliefs leaned towards intrinsic exchanges, with mixed results at low-ambiguity and high power asymmetric relations.
dc.description.otherThe present paper explores the antecedents of co-authorship recognition in the Brazilian community of business administration research. Confronted with schematic vignettes encompassing varying levels of ambiguous and power-asymmetric situations, respondents exposed their positioning vis-à-vis co-authorship. Respondents identified the Brazilian community as favoring extrinsic exchanges (i.e., recognition is granted independently from effort invested in the research itself) even at situations where there was neither ambiguity that low effort was invested by the benefitting parties, nor power-asymmetric relationships. In contrast, individuals’ beliefs leaned towards intrinsic exchanges, with mixed results at low-ambiguity and high power asymmetric relations.pt_BR
dc.format.extent41 p.pt_BR
dc.format.mediumDigitalpt_BR
dc.identifier.issueBEWP 149/2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.insper.edu.br/handle/11224/5934
dc.language.isoInglêspt_BR
dc.publisherInsperpt_BR
dc.publisherIBMEC - São Paulopt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInsper Working Paperpt_BR
dc.rights.licenseO INSPER E ESTE REPOSITÓRIO NÃO DETÊM OS DIREITOS DE USO E REPRODUÇÃO DOS CONTEÚDOS AQUI REGISTRADOS. É RESPONSABILIDADE DO USUÁRIO VERIFICAR OS USOS PERMITIDOS NA FONTE ORIGINAL, RESPEITANDO-SE OS DIREITOS DE AUTOR OU EDITORpt_BR
dc.subject.keywordsCo-authorshippt_BR
dc.subject.keywordsSociology of Sciencept_BR
dc.subject.keywordsEthicspt_BR
dc.subject.keywordsEthnomethodologypt_BR
dc.subject.keywordsBrazilpt_BR
dc.titleCo-Authorship Recognition Antecedents: the Brazilian research community casept_BR
dc.typeworking paper
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.subject.cnpqCiências Sociais Aplicadaspt_BR
local.typeWorking Paperpt_BR
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6a78e139-d40f-41eb-b258-6922f24afda5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6a78e139-d40f-41eb-b258-6922f24afda5

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
N/D
Nome:
BEWP_149_2012_Co_authorship_recognition_antecedents_the_brazilian_research_community_case_TC.pdf
Tamanho:
335.08 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format