1. Institucional Repository Insper
  2. Trabalho de Evento
  3. Coleção de Trabalhos Apresentados em Eventos
  4. Edited Democracy: Media Manipulation and the News Coverage of Presidential Debates
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.insper.edu.br/handle/11224/4722
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.rights.licenseO INSPER E ESTE REPOSITÓRIO NÃO DETÊM OS DIREITOS DE USO E REPRODUÇÃO DOS CONTEÚDOS AQUI REGISTRADOS. É RESPONSABILIDADE DOS USUÁRIOS INDIVIDUAIS VERIFICAR OS USOS PERMITIDOS NA FONTE ORIGINAL, RESPEITANDO-SE OS DIREITOS DE AUTOR OU EDITORpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-11T19:09:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-11T19:09:09Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.insper.edu.br/handle/11224/4722-
dc.format.extent38 p.pt_BR
dc.format.mediumDigitalpt_BR
dc.language.isoInglêspt_BR
dc.relation.urihttp://www.econ.puc-rio.br/en/seminars/381pt_BR
dc.titleEdited Democracy: Media Manipulation and the News Coverage of Presidential Debatespt_BR
dc.typeTrabalho de Eventopt_BR
dc.description.otherPolitical debates provide voters with a unique opportunity to learn about which candidates best represent their interests. They are complex campaign events that are followed by intensive media analysis and commentary. Despite growing evidence about their impact on voter behavior, little is known about their interrelated role with subsequent news coverage. This paper investigates the impact of an episode of manipulated TV coverage of a major presidential debate on the 1989 Brazilian presidential election. First, we present evidence from an online experiment that the coverage affects the audience’s evaluation of candidates differently then the actual debate. We then take advantage of a unique natural experiment regarding the geographical distribution of broadcaster-specific TV signal and the timing of election events in order to disentangle the effect of the coverage from the debate itself. By exploring both survey and actual election data, we find that the left-wing candidate lost 1.9−8.6 p.p. in vote share due to unfavorable coverage by the dominant TV network in Brazil. We also provide direct evidence that the mechanism works through a change in voters’ perception of who won the debate. Together, our set of results show how dominant media groups can distort the information generated by presidential debates through its subsequent news coverage, thus hindering the role of debates in informing voters.pt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCiências Humanaspt_BR
dc.subject.keywordspolitical debatespt_BR
dc.subject.keywordsmedia biaspt_BR
dc.subject.keywordselectionspt_BR
dc.relation.eventoEDITED DEMOCRACY: Media Manipulation and the News Coverage of Presidential Debatespt_BR
dc.contributor.autorNovaes, Lucas Martins-
dc.contributor.autorCavgias, Alexsandros-
dc.contributor.autorCorbi, Raphael Bottura-
dc.contributor.autorMeloni, Luis-
dc.coverage.paisNão Informadopt_BR
Appears in Collections:Coleção de Trabalhos Apresentados em Eventos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Apresentação_2019_ Edited Democracy_EV.pdfApresentação_2019_ Edited Democracy_EV751.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Recommend this item

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.