‘The Court, it is I’? Individual judicial powers in the Brazilian Supreme Court and their implications for constitutional theory

dc.contributor.authorDIEGO WERNECK ARGUELHES
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Leandro Molhano
dc.coverage.paisNão Informadopt_BR
dc.creatorRibeiro, Leandro Molhano
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-10T19:50:58Z
dc.date.available2022-11-10T19:50:58Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.otherCollective decision-making is often taken as an ‘institutional fact’ when it comes to supreme and constitutional courts. In this article, we focus on the example of the Brazilian Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal, or STF) to argue that this feature should not be assumed from the outset, as it does not necessarily hold, across countries, for all relevant powers that courts may have. As this example illustrates, the assignment to individual Justices of three distinct powers, namely agenda setting, position taking, and decision making, can have profound effects on the legislative status quo outside the court, amounting in some circumstances to a form of individual judicial review. This expanded typology of court powers both points to an underexplored spectrum for comparing different courts and makes it necessary to discuss if and how particular distributions of such powers within multi-member courts are normatively justified. In the specific case of the STF, we argue that the specific combination of individual allocations of agenda setting and decision-making powers, which gives rise in practice to the possibility of individual judicial review, cannot be reconciled with basic tenets of constitutional theory.pt_BR
dc.format.extentp. 236-262pt_BR
dc.format.mediumDigitalpt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381718000072pt_BR
dc.identifier.issue2pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.insper.edu.br/handle/11224/4695
dc.identifier.volume7pt_BR
dc.language.isoInglêspt_BR
dc.publisherCambridge University Presspt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Constitutionalismpt_BR
dc.rights.licenseO INSPER E ESTE REPOSITÓRIO NÃO DETÊM OS DIREITOS DE USO E REPRODUÇÃO DOS CONTEÚDOS AQUI REGISTRADOS. É RESPONSABILIDADE DOS USUÁRIOS INDIVIDUAIS VERIFICAR OS USOS PERMITIDOS NA FONTE ORIGINAL, RESPEITANDO-SE OS DIREITOS DE AUTOR OU EDITOR;pt_BR
dc.subject.keywordsconstitutional courtspt_BR
dc.subject.keywordsBrazilian Supreme Courtpt_BR
dc.subject.keywordsvoting rulespt_BR
dc.subject.keywordsjudicial reviewpt_BR
dc.subject.keywordscollegialitypt_BR
dc.title‘The Court, it is I’? Individual judicial powers in the Brazilian Supreme Court and their implications for constitutional theorypt_BR
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.identifier.sourceUrihttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/global-constitutionalism/article/abs/court-it-is-i-individual-judicial-powers-in-the-brazilian-supreme-court-and-their-implications-for-constitutional-theory/35AB97FDA81EE87B36A13F0414288464
local.subject.cnpqCiências Sociais Aplicadaspt_BR
local.typeArtigo Científicopt_BR
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6124bd30-d35a-4f0a-9f08-32e2cd64887d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6124bd30-d35a-4f0a-9f08-32e2cd64887d

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
N/D
Nome:
R_Artigo_Court it is I individual_judicial_powers_in_the_brazilian_2018_TC.pdf
Tamanho:
543.43 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
R_Artigo_Court it is I individual_judicial_powers_in_the_brazilian_2018_TC
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Acesso_Primeira Pagina_‘The Court, it is I’ Individual judicial powers in the Brazilian Supreme Court and their implications for constitutional theory.pdf
Tamanho:
425.49 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Acesso_Primeira Pagina_‘The Court, it is I’ Individual judicial powers in the Brazilian Supreme Court and their implications for constitutional theory.pdf
Tamanho:
425.49 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
N/D
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
282 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: