A comparison of strategies to develop a customer default scoring model
dc.contributor.author | RINALDO ARTES | |
dc.contributor.author | Pereira, Gustavo Henrique Araujo | |
dc.coverage.pais | Não Informado | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Pereira, Gustavo Henrique Araujo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-15T14:43:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-15T14:43:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.description.notes | Texto Completo | pt_BR |
dc.description.other | Behavioural scoring models are generally used to estimate the probability that a customer of a financial institution who owns a credit product will default on this product in a fixed time horizon. However, one single customer usually purchases many credit products from an institution while behavioural scoring models generally treat each of these products independently. In order to make credit risk management easier and more efficient, it is interesting to develop customer default scoring models. These models estimate the probability that a customer of a certain financial institution will have credit issues with at least one product in a fixed time horizon. In this study, three strategies to develop customer default scoring models are described. One of the strategies is regularly utilized by financial institutions and the other two will be proposed herein. The performance of these strategies is compared by means of an actual data bank supplied by a financial institution and a Monte Carlo simulation study. | pt_BR |
dc.format.extent | p. 1341-1352 | pt_BR |
dc.format.medium | Digital | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2016.23 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn | 01605682 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn | 14769360 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issue | 11 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.insper.edu.br/handle/11224/3988 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 67 | pt_BR |
dc.language.iso | Inglês | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | Palgrave | pt_BR |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of the Operational Research Society | pt_BR |
dc.rights.license | O INSPER E ESTE REPOSITÓRIO NÃO DETÊM OS DIREITOS DE USO E REPRODUÇÃO DOS CONTEÚDOS AQUI REGISTRADOS. É RESPONSABILIDADE DOS USUÁRIOS INDIVIDUAIS VERIFICAR OS USOS PERMITIDOS NA FONTE ORIGINAL, RESPEITANDO-SE OS DIREITOS DE AUTOR OU EDITOR | pt_BR |
dc.subject.keywords | credit scoring | pt_BR |
dc.subject.keywords | customer scoring | pt_BR |
dc.subject.keywords | generalized estimating equations | pt_BR |
dc.subject.keywords | logistic regression | pt_BR |
dc.subject.keywords | credit risk | pt_BR |
dc.title | A comparison of strategies to develop a customer default scoring model | pt_BR |
dc.type | journal article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.subject.cnpq | Ciências Exatas e da Terra | pt_BR |
local.type | Artigo Científico | pt_BR |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 8b791c94-f3e5-4e04-af26-594195a8f576 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 8b791c94-f3e5-4e04-af26-594195a8f576 |
Arquivos
Pacote original
1 - 2 de 2
N/D
- Nome:
- R_Artigo_2016_A comparison of strategies to develop_tc.pdf
- Tamanho:
- 308.3 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descrição:
- R_Artigo_2016_A comparison of strategies to develop_tc
- Nome:
- Acesso_Primeira Pagina_A comparison of strategies to develop a customer default scoring model.pdf
- Tamanho:
- 99.44 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
Licença do pacote
1 - 1 de 1
N/D
- Nome:
- license.txt
- Tamanho:
- 282 B
- Formato:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Descrição: