Do Formalist Judges Abide By Their Abstract Principles? A Two-Country Study in Adjudication

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorBystranowski, Piotr
dc.contributor.authorJanik, Bartosz
dc.contributor.authorPróchnicki, Maciej
dc.contributor.authorHannikainen, Ivar Rodriguez
dc.contributor.authorGUILHERME DA FRANCA COUTO FERNANDES DE ALMEIDA
dc.contributor.authorStruchiner, Noel
dc.creatorBystranowski, Piotr
dc.creatorJanik, Bartosz
dc.creatorPróchnicki, Maciej
dc.creatorHannikainen, Ivar Rodriguez
dc.creatorStruchiner, Noel
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T16:00:17Z
dc.date.available2024-09-17T16:00:17Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractRecent literature in experimental philosophy has postulated the existence of the abstract/concrete paradox (ACP): the tendency to activate inconsistent intuitions (and generate inconsistent judgment) depending on whether a problem to be analyzed is framed in abstract terms or is described as a concrete case. One recent study supports the thesis that this effect influences judicial decision-making, including decision-making by professional judges, in areas such as interpretation of constitutional principles and application of clear-cut rules. Here, following the existing literature in legal theory, we argue that the susceptibility to such an effect might depend on whether decision-makers operate in a legal system characterized by the formalist or particularist approach to legal interpretation, with formalist systems being less susceptible to the effect. To test this hypothesis, we compare the results of experimental studies on ACP run on samples from two countries differing in legal culture: Poland and Brazil. The lack of significant differences between those results (also for professional legal decision-makers) suggests that ACP is a robust effect in the legal context.en
dc.formatDigital
dc.format.extentp. 1903 – 1935
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11196-021-09846-6
dc.identifier.issn0952-8059
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.insper.edu.br/handle/11224/6963
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature Limited
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law
dc.subjectExperimental jurisprudenceen
dc.subjectAbstract/concrete paradoxen
dc.subjectIdentifability efecten
dc.subjectJudicialdecision-makingen
dc.subjectFormalismen
dc.titleDo Formalist Judges Abide By Their Abstract Principles? A Two-Country Study in Adjudication
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.identifier.sourceUrihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-021-09846-6#citeas
local.publisher.countryNão Informado
local.subject.cnpqCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS
local.typeArtigo Científico
publicationissue.issueNumber5
publicationvolume.volumeNumber35
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8575f912-24df-44e3-8512-a288b848e951
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8575f912-24df-44e3-8512-a288b848e951
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
N/D
Nome:
ACESSO_RESTRITO_Artigo_2021_Do_formalist_judges_abide_by_their_abstract_principles_a_two_country_study_in_adjudication_TC.pdf
Tamanho:
828.83 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar
Licença do Pacote
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
N/D
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
236 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Baixar
Coleções
Coleção de Artigos Acadêmicos