A hipótese de risk as feelings e crenças não-aditivas
N/D
Autores
Van der Ley, Júlia Oliveira
Orientador
Co-orientadores
Citações na Scopus
Tipo de documento
Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso
Data
2024
Resumo
Este trabalho tem como objetivo principal analisar a influência das emoções na escolha sob incerteza. A pesquisa se concentra na hipótese de risk as feelings (LOEWENSTEIN et al., 2001), que reconhece o papel dos sentimentos na tomada de decisão, incorporando-os nas escolhas sob incerteza. Entretanto, essa hipótese carece de uma formulação explícita que leve a potenciais aplicações com o uso de modelos matemáticos. A abordagem da utilidade esperada de Choquet introduzida por Schmeidler (1989), incorpora a noção de crenças não aditivas como uma resposta a problemas informacionais. O estudo investiga como as respostas emocionais podem afetar as preferências e decisões das pessoas em situações incertas, propondo que medidas não aditivas (ou capacidades) podem capturar esses fatores, representando as crenças dos agentes. Dessa forma, este trabalho busca contribuir com a literatura ao mostrar que as crenças não aditivas podem incorporar as emoções, mesmo em contextos que não há problemas informacionais.
This work aims to analyze the influence of emotions on decision-making under uncertainty. The research focuses on the risk as feelings hypothesis (LOEWENSTEIN et al., 2001), which acknowledges the role of feelings in decision-making by incorporating them into choices under uncertainty. However, this hypothesis lacks an explicit formulation that could lead to potential applications using mathematical models. The Choquet Expected Utility approach, introduced by Schmeidler (1989), incorporates the concept of non-additive beliefs as a response to informational problems. The study investigates how emotional responses can affect people's preferences and decisions in uncertain situations, proposing that non-additive measures (or capacities) can capture these factors, representing the beliefs of agents. In this way, this work seeks to contribute to the literature by showing that non-additive beliefs can incorporate emotions, even in contexts where there are no informational problems.
This work aims to analyze the influence of emotions on decision-making under uncertainty. The research focuses on the risk as feelings hypothesis (LOEWENSTEIN et al., 2001), which acknowledges the role of feelings in decision-making by incorporating them into choices under uncertainty. However, this hypothesis lacks an explicit formulation that could lead to potential applications using mathematical models. The Choquet Expected Utility approach, introduced by Schmeidler (1989), incorporates the concept of non-additive beliefs as a response to informational problems. The study investigates how emotional responses can affect people's preferences and decisions in uncertain situations, proposing that non-additive measures (or capacities) can capture these factors, representing the beliefs of agents. In this way, this work seeks to contribute to the literature by showing that non-additive beliefs can incorporate emotions, even in contexts where there are no informational problems.
Palavras-chave
risk as feelings; escolha sob incerteza; crenças não-aditivas; risk as feelings; choice under uncertainty; non-additive beliefs
Titulo de periódico
URL da fonte
Título de Livro
URL na Scopus
Idioma
Português
Notas
Membros da banca
Casaca, Paulo
Área do Conhecimento CNPQ
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ECONOMIA