Coordination and expertise foster legal textualism
Carregando...
Orientador
Co-orientadores
Citações na Scopus
Tipo de documento
Artigo Científico
Data
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Resumo
A cross-cultural survey experiment revealed a dominant tendency to rely on a rule’s letter over its spirit when deciding which behaviors violate the rule. This tendency varied markedly across (k = 15) countries, owing to variation in the impact of moral appraisals on judgments of rule violation. Compared with laypeople, legal experts were more inclined to disregard their moral evaluations of the acts altogether and consequently exhibited stronger textualist tendencies. Finally, we evaluated a plausible mechanism for the emergence of textualism: in a two-player coordination game, incentives to coordinate in the absence of communication reinforced participants’ adherence to rules’ literal meaning. Together, these studies (total n = 5,794) help clarify the origins and allure of textualism, especially in the law. Within heterogeneous communities in which members diverge in their moral appraisals involving a rule’s purpose, the rule’s literal meaning provides a clear focal point—an identifiable point of agreement enabling coordinated interpretation among citizens, lawmakers, and judges.
Palavras-chave
Titulo de periódico
PNAS
URL da fonte
Título de Livro
URL na Scopus
Idioma
Inglês
URL permanente
Notas
Membros da banca
Área do Conhecimento CNPQ
Ciências Sociais Aplicadas