Coordination and expertise foster legal textualism

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorHannikainen, Ivar R.
dc.contributor.authorTobia, Kevin P.
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Guilherme da F. C. F. de
dc.contributor.authorStruchiner, Noel
dc.contributor.authorKneer, Markus
dc.contributor.authorBystranowski, Piotr
dc.contributor.authorDranseika, Vilius
dc.contributor.authorStrohmaier, Niek
dc.contributor.authorBensinger, Samantha
dc.contributor.authorDolinina, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorJanik, Bartosz
dc.contributor.authorLauraityte, Egle
dc.contributor.authorLaakasuo, Michael
dc.contributor.authorLiefgreen, Alice
dc.contributor.authorNeiders, Ivars
dc.contributor.authorPróchnicki, Maciej
dc.contributor.authorRosas, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorSundvall, Jukka
dc.contributor.authorŻuradzki, Tomasz
dc.coverage.cidadePrincetonpt_BR
dc.coverage.paisEstados Unidospt_BR
dc.creatorHannikainen, Ivar R.
dc.creatorTobia, Kevin P.
dc.creatorAlmeida, Guilherme da F. C. F. de
dc.creatorStruchiner, Noel
dc.creatorKneer, Markus
dc.creatorBystranowski, Piotr
dc.creatorDranseika, Vilius
dc.creatorStrohmaier, Niek
dc.creatorBensinger, Samantha
dc.creatorDolinina, Kristina
dc.creatorJanik, Bartosz
dc.creatorLauraityte, Egle
dc.creatorLaakasuo, Michael
dc.creatorLiefgreen, Alice
dc.creatorNeiders, Ivars
dc.creatorPróchnicki, Maciej
dc.creatorRosas, Alejandro
dc.creatorSundvall, Jukka
dc.creatorŻuradzki, Tomasz
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T23:24:32Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T23:24:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractA cross-cultural survey experiment revealed a dominant tendency to rely on a rule’s letter over its spirit when deciding which behaviors violate the rule. This tendency varied markedly across (k = 15) countries, owing to variation in the impact of moral appraisals on judgments of rule violation. Compared with laypeople, legal experts were more inclined to disregard their moral evaluations of the acts altogether and consequently exhibited stronger textualist tendencies. Finally, we evaluated a plausible mechanism for the emergence of textualism: in a two-player coordination game, incentives to coordinate in the absence of communication reinforced participants’ adherence to rules’ literal meaning. Together, these studies (total n = 5,794) help clarify the origins and allure of textualism, especially in the law. Within heterogeneous communities in which members diverge in their moral appraisals involving a rule’s purpose, the rule’s literal meaning provides a clear focal point—an identifiable point of agreement enabling coordinated interpretation among citizens, lawmakers, and judges.
dc.format.extent8 p.pt_BR
dc.format.mediumDigitalpt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.2206531119pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1091-6490pt_BR
dc.identifier.issue44pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.insper.edu.br/handle/11224/6380
dc.identifier.volume119pt_BR
dc.language.isoInglêspt_BR
dc.publisherPrinceton Universitypt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPNASpt_BR
dc.rights.licenseO INSPER E ESTE REPOSITÓRIO NÃO DETÊM OS DIREITOS DE USO E REPRODUÇÃO DOS CONTEÚDOS AQUI REGISTRADOS. É RESPONSABILIDADE DO USUÁRIO VERIFICAR OS USOS PERMITIDOS NA FONTE ORIGINAL, RESPEITANDO-SE OS DIREITOS DE AUTOR OU EDITOR.pt_BR
dc.subjectMoral judgmentpt_BR
dc.subjectLegal decision makingpt_BR
dc.subjectCoordinationpt_BR
dc.subjectCross-cultural researchpt_BR
dc.titleCoordination and expertise foster legal textualismpt_BR
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.subject.cnpqCiências Sociais Aplicadaspt_BR
local.typeArtigo Científicopt_BR
Arquivos
Coleções
Coleção de Artigos Acadêmicos