"They don’t let us speak”: gender, collegiality, and interruptions in deliberations in the Brazilian Supreme Court

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorDIEGO WERNECK ARGUELHES
dc.contributor.authorAlvim, Juliana Cesario
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, Rafaela
dc.contributor.authorWang, Henrique
dc.creatorAlvim, Juliana Cesario
dc.creatorNogueira, Rafaela
dc.creatorWang, Henrique
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-02T18:03:26Z
dc.date.available2024-05-02T18:03:26Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we examine a database containing court rulings and debates (acórdãos) of the Brazilian Supreme Court (“STF”) spanning from 1999 to 2018. Our objective is to analyze the relationship between gender and how judges behave when interacting with each other. Specifically, we investigate whether female judges are more likely to be interrupted by their colleagues during oral debates. Our data are built on real-time public interactions between the judges, as recorded in the Court's transcripts. The results show that female STF judges are interrupted more often than their male counterparts. While male judges display no specific effects, all three female judges in our data display a very significant and positive probability of being interrupted, as compared to their male colleagues participating in the same deliberations. These results show that, even in institutions designed to protect rights of political minorities, including women, gender dynamics, stereotypes and hierarchies can affect the functioning of courts in visible ways, with potential impacts on the rest of the judiciary and the legal profession. They also suggest that merely increasing the number of female judges, without addressing underlying gender dynamics and procedural rules in the judicial decision-making process, is insufficient to tackle the disadvantages women face within those institutions.en
dc.formatDigital
dc.format.extentp. 174-207
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jels.12379
dc.identifier.issn1740-1461
dc.identifier.issn1740-1453
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.insper.edu.br/handle/11224/6624
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Empirical Legal Studies
dc.subjectBrazilian Supreme Court (STF)en
dc.subjectCollegialityen
dc.subjectGenderen
dc.subjectInterruptionsen
dc.subjectJudicial behavioren
dc.title"They don’t let us speak”: gender, collegiality, and interruptions in deliberations in the Brazilian Supreme Court
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.identifier.sourceUrihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jels.12379
local.publisher.countryReino Unido
local.subject.cnpqCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS
publicationissue.issueNumber1
publicationvolume.volumeNumber21
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6124bd30-d35a-4f0a-9f08-32e2cd64887d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6124bd30-d35a-4f0a-9f08-32e2cd64887d
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
N/D
Nome:
Artigo_They_dont_let_us_speak_gender_collegiality_and_interruptions_in_deliberations_in_the_brazilian_supreme_court_TC.pdf
Tamanho:
919.41 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Acesso_Primeira Pagina_They don’t let us speak gender, collegiality, and interruptions in deliberations in the Brazilian Supreme Court.pdf
Tamanho:
94.98 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar
Licença do Pacote
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
N/D
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
236 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Baixar
Coleções
Coleção de Artigos Acadêmicos