Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.insper.edu.br/handle/11224/4074
Type: Working Paper
Title: Judicial Review of Antitrust Decisions: incentives for settlements?
Author: Azevedo, Paulo Furquim de
Publication Date: 2017
Abstract: Judicial review is an essential part of competition policy institutions. In countries where the competition agency is an administrative body, judicial review may improve, mitigate or completely modify the administrative decision, and is, as a consequence, ultimately responsible for the enforcement of competition law. This article highlights an additional effect of judicial review: the incentives to induce settlements between competition authorities and companies, both in merger or conduct cases. I argue that the perspective of long and costly adversarial procedures associated to trials induce parts to negotiate and reach an agreement. I provide quantitative and qualitative evidence that Cade, the Brazilian competition authority, reacted strategically to the judicial review of its decisions, both by strengthening rules of due process and by fostering settlements with merged companies or defendants. The overall effect of judicial review on the efficacy of competition policy is ambiguous. The awareness towards due process and transparency improve decision quality, and settlements reduce litigation costs. However there is also evidence of a crowding-out effect, i.e. dynamically courts mainly tend to review cases in which parties seek to postpone the administrative decision whereas settlements attracts companies that value finality. This adverse selection of litigants distorts the role of the judicial review, as legitimate demanders of judicial services avoid the judiciary and bad litigators overload it
Keywords (english terms): Judicial review
competition policy
settlements
Language: Inglês
CNPq Area: Ciências Sociais Aplicadas
Copyright: O INSPER E ESTE REPOSITÓRIO NÃO DETÊM OS DIREITOS DE USO E REPRODUÇÃO DOS CONTEÚDOS AQUI REGISTRADOS. É RESPONSABILIDADE DOS USUÁRIOS INDIVIDUAIS VERIFICAR OS USOS PERMITIDOS NA FONTE ORIGINAL, RESPEITANDO-SE OS DIREITOS DE AUTOR OU EDITOR
Notes: Texto completo. Indicação de data de acordo com controle interno.
Appears in Collections:Coleção de Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
R_WP_2017_Judicial Review of Antitrust_TC.pdfR_WP_2017_Judicial Review of Antitrust_TC373.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.